Leadership Insight Series

Don't Believe Everything You Think

Cognitive & Behavioral
Published

"We suffer more in imagination than in reality."

Seneca

Leaders make decisions constantly, but many are made in reaction to thoughts, not reality. A story forms fast: what someone meant, why something failed, whether you're equipped. The thought feels like a fact. You act on it before you've examined it.

These four questions, adapted from Byron Katie's The Work, slow that down. Not to dismiss the thought. To examine it. The goal is to see clearly before you move.

NOTICE THIS FIRST: YOU'RE TRIGGERED WHEN…
  • You're replaying a conversation in your head
  • You've already decided what someone meant
  • You feel certain you're right and they're wrong
  • You're dreading or avoiding a conversation
  • Your reaction feels bigger than the situation
  • You're telling a story about why something failed

Name the thought. One sentence. "[Name] doesn't trust me." "I'm not equipped for this." "They're undermining the team." Now run it.

THE FOUR QUESTIONS
01
Q1: Is it true?
Don't answer fast. Your first "yes" is the belief, not an honest look. Sit one breath longer than comfortable. What's the actual evidence?
02
Q2: Absolutely true?
"Absolutely" is a high bar. You don't have access to their intent, only your experience of them. Have you been this certain and been wrong?
03
Q3: How do you react?
The thought isn't just a thought, it's shaping how you're showing up right now. How are you showing up in your body, tone, and choices because you're holding this?

Not "what if it were false," that's denial. This is imagination. Same room, same person, same moment. The thought simply isn't there.

In your body: Where does the tension go? What relaxes? What opens up? In the room: How do you listen differently? What do you notice that you couldn't see before? In your leadership: What decision or conversation becomes available that wasn't a moment ago?

Common Questions

How do thoughts affect leadership decisions?

More than most leaders realize, and in ways that are hard to catch in real time. Every decision gets filtered through a set of assumptions: about what's true, what's possible, who can be trusted, what the team is capable of, and most of those assumptions were formed long before the current situation. When the assumptions are accurate, the decisions are good. When they aren't, the decisions compound the error. The problem is that assumptions feel like facts from the inside. The leader isn't aware they're making them. They're just deciding, and the decision feels self-evidently right.

What does it mean to question your assumptions as a leader?

It means slowing down long enough to ask: what am I taking as true here that I haven't actually verified? Most leaders are fast thinkers in fast environments, which means the assumption-checking step gets skipped. The practical version is asking one extra question before acting on a strong conviction: what would need to be true for the opposite to be right? If that question is impossible to answer, the assumption probably hasn't been examined. If it's easy to answer, you've found the thing worth checking.

How do you know when your thinking is getting in your way?

When you keep arriving at the same conclusion regardless of the information in front of you. When the feedback you're getting from the team doesn't seem to be landing anywhere in your decision-making. When you find yourself certain about something that a reasonable person in your position should have questions about. These are the signals that the thinking has become the answer rather than a path to the answer. Byron Katie's work on "The Work" asks a simple question of any stressful thought: is it absolutely true? It's a deceptively useful question, because the honest answer is almost never yes.

Why do smart leaders make bad decisions?

Often because their intelligence becomes the problem. Smart leaders build mental models quickly and confidently, which makes them fast, and which also makes them more committed to those models when they're wrong. The faster you can build a convincing case for a position, the less likely you are to question it. Research on cognitive bias shows that intelligence doesn't reduce bias, it just makes people better at rationalizing the bias they already have. The smartest leaders tend to make the best decisions and the worst decisions, depending on whether there's someone around them willing to push back. Without that friction, the intelligence just runs faster in the wrong direction.

Start the Conversation

Go deeper → Why Your Leadership Team Avoids Hard Conversations